Opposing Taft and Roosevelt in the 1912 campaign was Woodrow Wilson, who up until a few years earlier had been a professor of political science and history, and then president of Princeton University. Following his defeat in an academic battle with the dean of the graduate school, Wilson, who had always wanted to enter politics, accepted the invitation of the state Democratic machine to be its gubernatorial candidate in 1910. He proved an adept campaigner, won, and then to the machine’s chagrin, became a reformer, pushing through progressive legislation in New Jersey aimed at controlling the large corporations.
Wilson won the Democratic nomination in 1912, but at the start of the campaign he did not have a real platform. He was essentially a states’ rights, Jeffersonian democrat who opposed the trusts, but did not know what to do about them. Moreover, Roosevelt’s idea of a strong federal government upset him as much as the idea of monopoly.
Then, just as Roosevelt had discovered Croly, Wilson met Louis Brandeis, who helped the presidential candidate put his ideas into a coherent form. The two men worked out what Wilson came to call the “New Freedom.” Instead of regulating monopoly, as Roosevelt suggested, they proposed to establish and enforce strict rules of competition. Wilson and Brandeis believed that big businesses could be controlled not by direct government regulation, but by making rules that would make it impossible for them to abuse their power.
Wilson appealed to democracy and to the “young men on the make,” people trying to enter the businesses or professions who found their opportunities circumscribed by the big corporations. For democracy to survive, he argued, the political process had to be free of the corrupting influence of gigantic monopolies. “This is a second struggle for emancipation,” he declared in a campaign speech in Denver. “If America is not to have free enterprise, then she can have freedom of no sort whatever.”
Wilson won the election, although with only a plurality of the popular vote, but there was no doubt that the American people expected his administration to be one of reform. In one of the most literate inaugural speeches in American history, Wilson, in lofty and often poetic phrases, articulated his dream of social righteousness and outlined the steps his administration would take.
The New Freedom represents an alternative vision to that of Theodore Roosevelt’s New Nationalism, and while the welfare state has been the dominant motif in modern American history, Wilson’s vision of a small-unit economy presided over by a government of limited powers still appeals strongly to many Americans.
For further reading: Arthur S. Link, Wilson: The New Freedom (1956); John Milton Cooper, Jr., The Warrior and the Priest (1983); and David Sarasohn, The Party of Reform: The Democrats in the Progressive Era (1989).
FIRST INAUGURAL (1913)
I n his campaign for election as President of the United States Woodrow Wilson-at the time Governor of the State of New Jersey maintained that special interests had too powerful a hand in Government administration and that government had “not been administered by the common people.” He took office determined to carry through a program of sweeping domestic reforms. His First Inaugural Address on March 4, 1913, reaffirmed the philosophy of the “new freedom” which he had enunciated during the campaign, and called for a larger role by government in regulation of the economy. It is with the Wilson Administration that the United States began the development of those welfare policies which have since become so familiar a feature of American national policies. Wilson’s Inaugural Address is one of the most notable statements of the American democratic creed; for eloquence it compares with President Jefferson’s First Inaugural and President Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address.
In this speech delivered before the Southern Commercial Congress at Mobile, Alabama, on October 27, 1913, President Woodrow Wilson announced his policy toward Latin America. The promises of the address were not consistently observed, but relations with the Latin American states were materially improved.
My Fellow Citizens:
There has been a change of government. It began two years ago, when the House of Representatives became Democratic by a decisive majority. It has now been completed. The Senate about to assemble will also be Democratic. The offices of President and Vice-President have been put into the hands of Democrats. What does the change mean? That is the question that is uppermost in our minds to-day. That is the question I am going to try to answer, in order, if I may, to interpret the occasion.
It means much more than the mere success of a party. The success of a party means little except when the Nation is using that party for large and definite purpose. No one can mistake the purpose for which the Nation now seeks to use the Democratic Party. It seeks to use it to interpret a change in its own plans and point of view. Some old things with which we had grown familiar, and which had begun to creep into the very habit of our thought and of our lives, have altered their aspect as we have latterly looked critically upon them, with fresh, awakened eyes; have dropped their disguises and shown new things, as we look frankly upon them, willing to comprehend their real character, have come to assume the aspect of things long believed in and familiar, stuff of our own convictions. We have been refreshed by a new insight into our own life.
We see that in many things that life is very great. It is incomparably great in its material aspects, in its body of wealth, in the diversity and sweep of its energy, in the industries which have been conceived and built up by genius of individual men and the limitless enterprise of groups of men. It is great, also, very great, in its moral force.
Nowhere else in the world have noble men and women exhibited in more striking forms the beauty and the energy of sympathy and helpfulness and counsel in their efforts to rectify wrong, alleviate suffering, and set the weak in the way of strength and hope. We have built up, moreover, a great system of government, which has stood through a long age as in many respects a model for those who seek to set liberty upon foundations that will endure against fortuitous change, against storm and accident. Our life contains every great thing, and contains it in rich abundance.
But the evil has come with the good, and much fine gold has been corroded. With riches has come inexcusable waste. We have squandered a great part of what we might have used, and have not stopped to conserve the exceeding bounty of nature without which our genius for enterprise would have been worthless and impotent, scorning to be careful, shamefully prodigal as well as admirably efficient. We have been proud of our industrial achievements, but we have not hitherto stopped thoughtfully enough to count the human cost, the cost of lives snuffed out, of energies overtaxed and broken, the fearful physical and spiritual cost to the men and women and children upon whom the dead weight and burden of it all has fallen pitilessly the years through. The groans and agony of it all had not yet reached our ears, the solemn, moving undertone of our life, coming up out of the mines and factories and out of every home where the struggle had its intimate and familiar seat. With the great Government went many deep secret things which we too long delayed to look into and scrutinize with candid, fearless eyes. The great Government we loved has too often been made use of for private and selfish purposes, and those who used it had forgotten the people.
At last a vision has been vouchsafed us of our life as a whole. We see the bad with the good, the debased and decadent with the sound and vital. With this vision we approach new affairs. Our duty is to cleanse, to reconsider, to restore, to correct the evil without impairing the good, to purify and humanize every process of our common life without weakening or sentimentalizing it. There has been something crude and heartless and unfeeling in our haste to succeed and be great. Our thought has been “Let every man look out for himself, let every generation look out for itself,” while we reared giant machinery which made it impossible that any but those who stood at the levers of control should have a chance to look out for themselves. We had not forgotten our morals. We remembered well enough that we had set up policy which was meant to serve the humblest as well as the most powerful, with an eye single to the standards of justice and fair play, and remembered it with pride. But we were very heedless and in a hurry to be great.
We have come now to the sober second thought. The scales of heedlessness have fallen from our eyes. We have made up our minds to square every process of our national life again with the standards we so proudly set up at the beginning and have always carried at our hearts. Our work is a work of restoration.
We have itemized with some degree of particularity the things that ought to be altered and here are some of the chief items: A tariff which cuts us off from our proper part in the commerce of the world, violates the just principles of taxation, and makes the Government a facile instrument in the hands of private interests; a banking and currency system based upon the necessity of the Government to sell its bonds fifty years ago and perfectly adapted to concentrating cash and restricting credits; an industrial system which, take it on all its sides, financial as well as administrative, holds capital in leading strings, restricts the liberties and limits the opportunities of labor, and exploits without renewing or conserving the natural resources of the country; a body of agricultural activities never yet given the efficiency of great business undertakings or served as it should be through the instrumentality of science taken directly to the farm, or afforded the facilities of credit best suited to its practical needs; water-courses undeveloped, waste places unreclaimed, forests untended, fast disappearing without plan or prospect of renewal, unregarded waste heaps at every mine. We have the most effective means of production, but we have not studied cost or economy as we should either as organizers of industry, as statesmen, or as individuals.
Nor have we studied and perfected the means by which government may be put at the service of humanity, in safeguarding the health of the Nation, the health of its men and its women and its children, as well as their rights in the struggle for existence. This is no sentimental duty. The firm basis of government is justice, not pity. These are matters of justice. There can be no equality or opportunity, the first essential of justice in the body politic, if men and women and children be not shielded in their lives, their very vitality, from the consequences of great industrial and social processes which they can not alter, control, or singly cope with. Society must see to it that it does not itself crush or weaken or damage its own constituent parts. The first duty of law is to keep sound the society it serves. Sanitary laws, pure food laws, and laws determining conditions of labor which individuals are powerless to determine for themselves are intimate parts of the very business of justice and legal efficiency.
These are some of the things we ought to do, and not leave the others undone, the old fashioned, never-to-be-neglected, fundamental safeguarding of property and of individual right. This is the high enterprise of the new day: To lift everything that concerns our life as a Nation to the light that shines from the hearthfire of every man’s conscience and vision of the right. It is inconceivable that we should do this as partisans; it is inconceivable we should do it in ignorance of the facts as they are or in blind haste. We shall restore, not destroy. We shall deal with our economic system as it is and as it may be modified, not as it might be if we had a clean sheet of paper to write upon; and step by step we shall make it what it should be, in the spirit of those who question their own shallow self-satisfaction of the excitement of excursions whither they can not tell. Justice, and only justice, shall always be our motto.
And yet it will be no cool process of mere science. The Nation has been deeply stirred, stirred by solemn passion, stirred by the knowledge of wrong, of ideals lost, of government too often debauched and made an instrument of evil. The feelings with which we face this new age of right and opportunity sweep across our heartstrings like some air out of God’s own presence, where justice and mercy are reconciled and the judge and the brother are one. We know our task to be no mere task of politics but a task which shall search us through and through, whether we be able to understand our time and the need of our people, whether we be indeed their spokesmen and interpreters, whether we have the pure heart to comprehend and the rectified will to choose our high course of action. This is not a day of triumph; it is a day of dedication. Here muster, not the forces of party, but the forces of humanity. Men’s hearts wait upon us; men’s lives hang in the balance; men’s hopes call upon us to say what we will do. Who shall live up to the great trust? Who dares fail to try? I summon all honest men, all patriotic, all forward-looking men, to my side. God helping me, I will not fail them, if they will but counsel and sustain me!